Seeking Deeper Understanding #053

SDTEST^® has 38 different VUCA polls that calculate the 13,643 correlation values between stages of development according to the theory of Spiral Dynamics and answer options of these 38 polls.

We invite curiosity about the systemic mechanisms behind this correlation. There may be hidden variables that provide alternative explanations.

In our analysis of the poll "Factors that impact team effectiveness" (by Google), we found an intriguing negative correlation that warrants closer examination:  

-0.1232 between the Meaning and the Purple stage. 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0564. This negative correlation of -0.1232 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This negative correlation of -0.1232 between Meaning as a team effectiveness factor and the Purple stage offers illuminating insights when viewed through the lens of the Purple value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Purple mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation that organizational success stems from sacred traditions rather than constructed meaning.
2. Confirmation that ancestral wisdom and rituals matter more than modern notions of purpose.
3. Evidence supporting their belief that divine guidance supersedes individual meaning-making.

These organizations might respond by:

• Strengthening traditional ceremonies and rituals in workplace practices.
• Implementing systems that honor ancestral wisdom and spiritual guidance.
• Creating spaces for tribal gatherings and collective spiritual experiences.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Purple mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their focus on tribal bonds over individual purpose.
2. Interpreting it as validation for prioritizing sacred traditions over modern meaning.
3. Seeing it as support for maintaining spiritual unity over personal fulfillment.

These teams might respond by:

• Incorporating more ritual-based team activities and ceremonies.
• Creating stronger tribal identities through shared spiritual practices.
• Fostering deeper connections to ancestral wisdom and traditions.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Purple value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their commitment to tribal traditions over individual meaning.
2. Evidence supporting their belief in spiritual guidance over personal purpose-finding.
3. Confirmation of the value they place on ancestral wisdom over modern meaning-making.

These individuals might respond by:

• Deepening their connection to tribal traditions and rituals.
• Seeking guidance from spiritual leaders rather than personal meaning.
• Prioritizing group harmony and sacred practices over individual purpose.

This correlation, viewed through the Purple lens, suggests that those operating at the Purple level may place less emphasis on modern concepts of meaning in team effectiveness. It implies that the Purple value system's focus on tradition, spirituality, and tribal bonds supersedes contemporary notions of personal and team purpose.

The reasons why Meaning might not be seen as a primary factor in team effectiveness in the Purple stage include:

1. Spiritual Priority: Divine guidance and sacred traditions take precedence over constructed meaning.
2. Ancestral Wisdom: Traditional knowledge is valued over modern concepts of purpose.
3. Tribal Unity: Group harmony through shared rituals matters more than individual meaning.
4. Sacred Order: Following established spiritual practices supersedes creating new meaning.
5. Collective Identity: Tribal belonging provides deeper significance than constructed purpose.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence perceptions of team effectiveness. It raises questions about the role of traditional spirituality versus modern meaning-making, particularly in contexts where ancestral wisdom and tribal bonds are paramount.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights how Purple-dominant environments prioritize spiritual and traditional elements over modern concepts of meaning. Team effectiveness might be seen not through the lens of purpose and meaning but through adherence to sacred traditions and tribal unity.

In our analysis of the poll "The main priorities of job seekers," we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.1062 between the Career opportunities and the Red stage. 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.06. This positive correlation of 0.1062 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.1062 between Career opportunities and the Red stage offers compelling insights when viewed through the lens of the Red value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Red mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their power-driven approach to career advancement and promotion.
2. Confirmation that ambitious career paths attract and retain dominant personalities.
3. Evidence supporting their belief that career advancement is a form of conquest.

These organizations might respond by:

• Creating aggressive advancement tracks that reward bold, assertive behavior.
• Implementing competitive promotion systems based on individual achievement.
• Establishing clear power hierarchies with visible symbols of status advancement.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Red mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their competitive team dynamic for advancement.
2. Interpreting it as validation for prioritizing individual achievement over collaboration.
3. Seeing it as support for creating internal competition for promotions.

These teams might respond by:

• Fostering competitive environments where members fight for advancement.
• Creating visible hierarchies within team structures.
• Celebrating individual achievements and career victories.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Red value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their aggressive pursuit of career advancement.
2. Evidence supporting their focus on power accumulation through promotion.
3. Confirmation of the value they place on dominating their career path.

These individuals might respond by:

• Actively seeking opportunities to demonstrate power and dominance.
• Using career advancement as a means to gain more control and authority.
• Pursuing rapid promotion regardless of relationships or long-term consequences.

This correlation, viewed through the Red lens, suggests that those operating at the Red level are strongly motivated by career advancement opportunities. It implies that the Red value system's focus on power, dominance, and immediate gratification aligns with aggressive career pursuits.

The reasons why Career opportunities are prioritized in the Red stage include:

1. Power Acquisition: Career advancement represents direct access to more power and control.
2. Status Display: Higher positions provide visible symbols of dominance and success.
3. Competitive Drive: Career progression satisfies the need for conquest and victory.
4. Immediate Rewards: Promotions offer tangible, immediate gratification.
5. Individual Achievement: Career success demonstrates personal power and superiority.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence job seeking priorities. It raises questions about the role of power and dominance in career advancement, particularly in contexts where immediate gratification and individual achievement are paramount.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the aggressive nature of career pursuit in Red-dominant environments. Career opportunities might be seen not as developmental paths but as battlegrounds for power acquisition and dominance establishment.

In our analysis of the poll "Actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month (fact, %)," we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.4851 between the Employees were sent on unpaid vacation and the Blue stage (Germany, 4 languages). 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.4686. This positive correlation of 0.4851 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.4851 between unpaid vacation decisions and the Blue stage was analyzed in the context of Germany's economic situation of 2024, when the country was facing economic challenges including slow growth forecasts and manufacturing sector pressures. It offers significant insights when viewed through the lens of the Blue value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Blue mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their structured approach to managing organizational challenges through established procedures.
2. Confirmation that following proper protocols in workforce management maintains order.
3. Evidence supporting their belief in sacrificing for the greater good of the organization.

These organizations might respond by:

• Implementing standardized procedures for managing workforce adjustments.
• Creating detailed documentation and justification for unpaid leave decisions.
• Establishing clear hierarchical communication channels for policy implementation.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Blue mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their duty to accept organizational decisions.
2. Interpreting it as validation for maintaining order through structured sacrifice.
3. Seeing it as support for following established protocols even in difficult times.

These teams might respond by:

• Adhering strictly to organizational policies regarding unpaid leave.
• Supporting hierarchical decision-making processes.
• Maintaining disciplined documentation of absence procedures.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Blue value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their duty to accept organizational decisions.
2. Evidence supporting their belief in sacrifice for organizational stability.
3. Confirmation of the value they place on following proper procedures.

These individuals might respond by:

• Accepting unpaid leave as a necessary organizational measure.
• Following proper protocols for requesting and documenting leave.
• Maintaining loyalty to the organization despite personal sacrifice.

This correlation, viewed through the Blue lens, suggests that those operating at the Blue level approach unpaid vacation through the lens of duty and order. It implies that the Blue value system's focus on structure, hierarchy, and proper procedures aligns with formal workforce management approaches.

The reasons why unpaid vacation might be implemented in the Blue stage include:

1. Procedural Correctness: Following established protocols for workforce management.
2. Organizational Duty: Accepting sacrifice for organizational stability.
3. Hierarchical Authority: Respecting decisions made by proper authorities.
4. Structured Response: Managing challenges through formal systems.
5. Moral Responsibility: Upholding organizational values through difficult decisions.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence organizational decisions in 2024 Germany. It raises questions about the role of duty and order in workforce management, particularly in contexts where traditional values and structured approaches intersect with contemporary economic challenges. The German business environment in 2024, characterized by cautious economic outlook and industry-specific pressures, provides important context for understanding these organizational responses.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the structured approach to workforce management in Blue-dominant environments. Unpaid vacation might be seen not as a mere cost-saving measure but as a proper procedural response aligned with organizational order and authority.

In our analysis of the poll "Three Distinct Possibilities of the Future" (by Dr. Clare W. Graves), we found an intriguing negative correlation that warrants closer examination:  

-0.2119 between the A massive regression back to our stone-age beginnings if we fail to stabilize our world's weapons and endangered resources and the Orange stage.

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.1908. This negative correlation of -0.2119 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This negative correlation of -0.2119 between concerns about societal regression and the Orange stage offers compelling insights when viewed through the lens of the Orange value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Orange mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their confidence in technological solutions to global challenges.
2. Confirmation that scientific progress and innovation prevent regression.
3. Evidence supporting their belief in market-driven solutions to resource management.

These organizations might respond by:

• Increasing investment in technological advancement and innovation.
• Implementing data-driven strategies for resource optimization.
• Creating competitive advantages through scientific solutions.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from an Orange mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their focus on progress through innovation.
2. Interpreting it as validation for prioritizing technological solutions over doomsday scenarios.
3. Seeing it as support for rational, results-driven approaches to challenges.

These teams might respond by:

• Developing measurable metrics for tracking progress and success.
• Creating efficiency-focused solutions to resource management.
• Fostering competitive innovation in problem-solving approaches.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Orange value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their belief in human ingenuity and progress.
2. Evidence supporting their focus on achievement over apocalyptic thinking.
3. Confirmation of the value they place on rational solutions over fear-based scenarios.

These individuals might respond by:

• Actively pursuing technological solutions to global challenges.
• Viewing challenges as opportunities for innovation and advancement.
• Using scientific methods to address resource management issues.

This correlation, viewed through the Orange lens, suggests that those operating at the Orange level are less likely to envision catastrophic regression scenarios. It implies that the Orange value system's focus on progress, technology, and rational problem-solving leads to optimistic views of humanity's ability to overcome challenges.

The reasons why regression scenarios might be rejected in the Orange stage include:

1. Technological Faith: Belief in humanity's ability to innovate solutions.
2. Progress Orientation: Focus on advancement rather than regression.
3. Scientific Solutions: Trust in rational approaches to global challenges.
4. Market Efficiency: Belief in economic systems' ability to optimize resource allocation.
5. Innovation Drive: Confidence in continuous improvement and development.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence perceptions of future scenarios. It raises questions about the role of technological optimism versus environmental concern, particularly in contexts where scientific progress and resource management intersect.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the optimistic nature of technological thinking in Orange-dominant environments. Global challenges might be seen not as potential causes of regression but as opportunities for innovation and advancement through scientific solutions.

In our analysis of the poll "What makes people successful at work?" we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.2137 between the Empathy and the Green stage (France, 4 languages). 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.2049. This positive correlation of 0.2137 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.2137 between Empathy and success at work in the Green stage (in France) offers meaningful insights when viewed through the lens of the Green value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Green mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their humanistic approach to organizational success.
2. Confirmation that emotional intelligence drives sustainable performance.
3. Evidence supporting their belief in collective wellbeing as a path to achievement.

These organizations might respond by:

• Implementing empathy-based leadership development programs.
• Creating systems that reward emotional intelligence and interpersonal skills.
• Developing metrics that measure success through stakeholder wellbeing.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Green mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their collaborative, supportive culture.
2. Interpreting it as validation for prioritizing emotional connections.
3. Seeing it as support for building psychological safety through empathy.

These teams might respond by:

• Incorporating emotional check-ins into team practices.
• Creating spaces for authentic connection and vulnerability.
• Developing team norms that celebrate empathetic behaviors.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Green value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their focus on human connection at work.
2. Evidence supporting their investment in emotional intelligence.
3. Confirmation of the value they place on authentic relationships.

These individuals might respond by:

• Actively developing their empathetic capabilities.
• Prioritizing relationship-building in their work approach.
• Seeking roles that allow for meaningful human connection.

This correlation, viewed through the Green lens, suggests that those operating at the Green level (in France) recognize empathy as crucial for workplace success. It implies that the Green value system's focus on human connection and collective wellbeing aligns with effective professional achievement.

The reasons why Empathy drives success in the Green stage include:

1. Holistic Understanding: Empathy enables comprehensive stakeholder awareness.
2. Sustainable Relationships: Emotional intelligence builds lasting professional connections.
3. Collective Growth: Empathetic approaches foster team development.
4. Authentic Leadership: Success stems from genuine human connection.
5. Systemic Awareness: Empathy supports understanding of organizational dynamics.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence definitions of workplace success. It raises questions about the role of emotional intelligence in professional achievement, particularly in French organizational contexts where human connection is valued.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the transformative power of empathy in Green-dominant environments. Success might be seen not through traditional metrics but through the lens of authentic human connection and collective wellbeing.

In our analysis of the poll "Reasons why people give up" (by Anna Vital [1]), we found an intriguing negative correlation that warrants closer examination:  

-0.2889 between the Feel sorry for themselves and the Yellow stage (USA, 3 languages).

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.1936. This negative correlation of -0.2889 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This negative correlation of -0.2889 between self-pity and the Yellow stage in USA offers revealing insights through the Yellow value system lens:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Yellow mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their systems-thinking approach to challenges and setbacks.
2. Confirmation that integrative problem-solving transcends emotional reactions.
3. Evidence supporting their focus on growth through complexity.

These organizations might respond by:

• Implementing frameworks that transform challenges into learning opportunities.
• Creating adaptive systems that support personal and organizational evolution.
• Developing metrics that measure resilience and systemic growth.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Yellow mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their adaptive problem-solving capabilities.
2. Interpreting it as validation for transcending emotional barriers.
3. Seeing it as support for integrative approaches to challenges.

These teams might respond by:

• Fostering environments that transform setbacks into evolutionary catalysts.
• Creating spaces for multi-perspective problem analysis.
• Developing practices that integrate challenges into growth pathways.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Yellow value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their transcendent approach to obstacles.
2. Evidence supporting their focus on systemic understanding over emotional reaction.
3. Confirmation of their ability to integrate challenges into personal development.

These individuals might respond by:

• Actively seeking complex challenges as growth opportunities.
• Viewing setbacks through multiple developmental lenses.
• Using difficulties as catalysts for systemic understanding.

This correlation, viewed through the Yellow lens, suggests those operating at the Yellow level in USA transcend self-pity in favor of integrative understanding. It implies that the Yellow value system's focus on complexity and personal evolution supersedes emotional self-limitation.

The reasons why self-pity might not be seen as a cause for giving up in the Yellow stage include:

1. Systemic Awareness: Understanding challenges within larger developmental patterns.
2. Integrative Growth: Viewing obstacles as opportunities for evolution.
3. Multi-perspective Processing: Seeing difficulties through various developmental lenses.
4. Adaptive Response: Transforming setbacks into catalysts for growth.
5. Evolutionary Purpose: Recognizing challenges as part of systemic development.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence responses to adversity. It raises questions about the evolution of resilience, particularly in contexts where systemic understanding and personal growth are prioritized.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the transcendent nature of challenge response in Yellow-dominant environments. Self-pity might be seen not as a reason for giving up but as an outdated response superseded by integrative understanding and evolutionary growth.

In our analysis of the poll "Trust" (by WVS), we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.1474 between the Most people can be trusted and the Turquoise stage. 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0624. This positive correlation of 0.1474 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.1474 between trust and the Turquoise stage offers fascinating insights through the lens of the Turquoise value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Turquoise mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their systemic approach that recognizes interconnectedness and mutual dependence.
2. Confirmation that fostering trust enables holistic collaboration and sustainable innovation.
3. Evidence supporting their belief in collective consciousness and shared responsibility.

These organizations might respond by:

• Implementing more collaborative decision-making processes that honor diverse perspectives.
• Creating systems that support transparency and open communication across all levels.
• Developing practices that nurture both human and environmental well-being.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Turquoise mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as confirmation of their integrative and inclusive team dynamics.
2. Interpreting it as support for their focus on collective wisdom and shared purpose.
3. Seeing it as validation for prioritizing psychological safety and authentic expression.

These teams might respond by:

• Fostering deeper connections through meaningful dialogue and shared experiences.
• Creating spaces for collective reflection and emergent understanding.
• Celebrating diversity while recognizing the underlying unity of team purpose.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Turquoise value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their holistic worldview and trust in collective wisdom.
2. Evidence supporting their belief in human potential and interconnectedness.
3. Confirmation of the value they place on authentic relationships and mutual growth.

These individuals might respond by:

• Actively cultivating trust through genuine presence and empathic listening.
• Viewing trust as a natural expression of universal interconnection.
• Using trust to foster deeper understanding and collective evolution.

This correlation, viewed through the Turquoise lens, suggests that those operating at the Turquoise level demonstrate higher levels of trust in others. It implies that the Turquoise value system's holistic understanding, recognition of interconnectedness, and focus on collective consciousness naturally align with a more trusting approach to human relationships.

The reasons why trust might be particularly strong in the Turquoise stage include:

1. Holistic Awareness: Understanding interconnectedness naturally leads to greater trust.
2. Systemic Thinking: Recognition that trust is fundamental to healthy system functioning.
3. Evolutionary Perspective: Trust seen as essential for collective human development.
4. Integral Vision: Ability to hold multiple perspectives promotes understanding and trust.
5. Universal Care: Deep concern for all beings naturally fosters trustworthy behavior.

This correlation highlights how evolving consciousness influences social dynamics. It suggests that as individuals and organizations develop more integrated perspectives, trust becomes a natural expression of their understanding of interconnection.

The correlation invites us to consider how fostering Turquoise values might contribute to building more trusting societies, while acknowledging the complexity of human development and social transformation.

We welcome respectful and wise perspectives! Stay tuned every week as we share more results and insights. 

After login or registration, free access to the poll results in the FAQ section.

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/annavital/

വലേരി കോസെസെസ്കോ

ഉൽപ്പന്ന ഉടമ SaaS SDTEST®

വലേരി 1993-ൽ ഒരു സോഷ്യൽ പെഡഗോഗ്-സൈക്കോളജിസ്റ്റായി യോഗ്യത നേടി, അതിനുശേഷം പ്രോജക്ട് മാനേജ്‌മെൻ്റിൽ തൻ്റെ അറിവ് പ്രയോഗിച്ചു.
വലേരിക്ക് 2013-ൽ മാസ്റ്റർ ബിരുദവും പ്രോജക്ടും പ്രോഗ്രാം മാനേജർ യോഗ്യതയും ലഭിച്ചു. മാസ്റ്റേഴ്സ് പ്രോഗ്രാമിൽ, പ്രോജക്റ്റ് റോഡ്മാപ്പും (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) സ്പൈറൽ ഡൈനാമിക്സും അദ്ദേഹത്തിന് പരിചിതമായി.
V.U.C.A യുടെ അനിശ്ചിതത്വം പര്യവേക്ഷണം ചെയ്ത രചയിതാവാണ് വലേരി. മനഃശാസ്ത്രത്തിലെ സ്പൈറൽ ഡൈനാമിക്സും ഗണിതശാസ്ത്ര സ്ഥിതിവിവരക്കണക്കുകളും ഉപയോഗിച്ചുള്ള ആശയം, കൂടാതെ 38 അന്താരാഷ്ട്ര വോട്ടെടുപ്പുകൾ.