We invite curiosity about the systemic mechanisms behind this correlation. There may be hidden variables that provide alternative explanations.
This negative correlation of -0.2380 between providing growth opportunities as a key to motivating teams and the Purple stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Purple value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Purple mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- Confirmation that individual growth opportunities may disrupt the organization's sacred order and established traditions.
- Validation that motivating teams is best achieved through reinforcing collective identity and shared spiritual experiences.
- Evidence that pushing team members out of their comfort zones could threaten the delicate balance of roles within the organizational tribe.
These organizations might respond by:
- Emphasizing the importance of maintaining one's designated role as a form of service to the collective.
- Implementing motivation strategies centered around group rituals and ceremonies rather than individual development.
- Discouraging "stretch assignments" in favor of perfecting one's traditional role within the organizational structure.
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Purple mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing individual growth opportunities as potentially disruptive to team harmony and established hierarchies.
- Interpreting the pursuit of personal growth as a possible betrayal of ancestral wisdom and team traditions.
- Seeing comfort zones not as limitations but as sacred spaces where team members can best serve the collective.
These teams might respond by:
- Reinforcing the importance of learning and adhering to established team practices over seeking new challenges.
- Implementing motivation systems based on honoring one's place within the team's mythic structure.
- Organizing team-building activities that celebrate shared history rather than pushing for individual growth.
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Purple value system might interpret this correlation as:
- Affirmation that seeking personal growth opportunities may anger the spirits or disrupt cosmic harmony.
- Validation of their belief that true fulfillment comes from embracing one's predetermined role within the group.
- Evidence that challenging oneself through "stretch assignments" is less important than maintaining spiritual connections with teammates and ancestors.
These individuals might respond by:
- Resisting opportunities for personal growth that might separate them from their team's shared identity.
- Finding motivation in deepening their understanding of team myths and rituals rather than expanding their skill set.
- Prioritizing the preservation and passing down of team wisdom over acquiring new, potentially disruptive knowledge.
This correlation, viewed through the Purple lens, suggests that providing growth opportunities may be seen as counterproductive or even threatening to team motivation in Purple value systems. It implies that the Purple characteristics of community focus, spiritual connectedness, and reverence for tradition are fundamentally at odds with the concept of individual growth and challenge as motivational tools.
Ultimately, this correlation speaks to value systems' profound influence on motivation and team dynamics perceptions. It reminds us that in the Purple worldview, the most potent motivators may not be opportunities for individual growth but rather the chance to deepen one's connection to the team's shared mythos, honor ancestral wisdom, and maintain the sacred order of the organizational tribe.
This negative correlation of -0.2491 between strongly disagreeing that real freedom is found in being strong and powerful, able to dominate others, and the Red stage effectively indicates a positive relationship between the Red value system and the belief that freedom comes from strength and domination. Here's an analysis through the Red value system lens:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Red mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- Validation of their power-centric organizational structure and competitive culture.
- Confirmation that fostering a domineering environment creates a sense of freedom and success.
- Evidence supporting their approach of rewarding assertiveness and individual achievement.
These organizations might respond by:
- Implementing more aggressive performance metrics that celebrate domination of market share or competitors.
- Designing training programs that emphasize personal power and assertiveness skills.
- Cultivating a corporate culture that glorifies strength and the ability to overpower rivals.
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Red mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing it as an affirmation of the need for a clear power hierarchy within the team.
- Interpreting it as support for encouraging intra-team competition to drive performance.
- Seeing it as justification for promoting the most dominant and assertive team members.
These teams might respond by:
- Adopting a "survival of the fittest" mentality in project assignments and resource allocation.
- Implementing reward systems that favor those who demonstrate power and control over others.
- Organizing team-building activities that pit members against each other to prove their strength.
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Red value system might interpret this correlation as:
- Confirmation that their pursuit of personal power and dominance is the path to true freedom.
- Validation of their belief that strength and the ability to control others are paramount to success.
- Evidence that their aggressive and self-centered approach to life and work is justified.
These individuals might respond by:
- Doubling down on assertive and domineering behaviors in their professional and personal lives.
- Seeking opportunities to demonstrate their power and influence over others.
- Viewing relationships and interactions as contests to be won rather than collaborations.
This correlation, viewed through the Red lens, suggests that those operating at the Red level strongly associate freedom with power, strength, and the ability to dominate others. It implies that the Red value system's characteristics of impulsiveness, self-centeredness, and desire for immediate gratification align with a worldview where freedom is achieved through force and control.
Ultimately, this correlation shows the complex relationship between individual power and perceived freedom. It reminds us that in the Red worldview, true freedom is not about cooperation or mutual respect but about having the strength and power to impose one's will on others and the environment.
This positive correlation of 0.3354 between strongly disagreeing that one must not give false evidence even to help an innocent person avoid jail, and the Blue stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Blue value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Blue mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- A concerning deviation from the strict moral code and rules that form the foundation of their organizational structure.
- Evidence of a potential threat to the established order and hierarchy within the organization.
- A challenge to the absolute nature of truth and honesty that the organization holds as sacrosanct.
These organizations might respond by:
- Reinforcing training programs that emphasize the importance of absolute honesty and adherence to rules.
- Implementing stricter oversight and disciplinary measures for any perceived deviation from established moral codes.
- Launching internal campaigns to reaffirm the organization's commitment to truth and ethical behavior.
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Blue mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing it as potentially eroding the team's moral fabric and shared values.
- Interpreting it as a sign that some team members might prioritize personal judgment over established rules.
- Seeing it as a threat to the team's unity and shared sense of purpose.
These teams might respond by:
- Conducting regular meetings to reaffirm the team's commitment to honesty and rule-following.
- Implementing peer review systems to ensure all team members adhere strictly to ethical guidelines.
- Developing team-building exercises that reinforce the importance of unwavering loyalty to the established moral code.
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Blue value system might interpret this correlation as:
- A personal moral crisis, questioning their own adherence to the absolute nature of truth.
- A test of their faith in the established order and moral authorities.
- A challenge to reconcile their sense of compassion with their duty to uphold the truth at all costs.
These individuals might respond by:
- Seeking guidance from religious or moral authorities to reinforce their commitment to absolute honesty.
- Engaging in personal reflection and prayer to strengthen their resolve to follow the established moral code.
- Actively advocating for the importance of truthfulness in all situations, even when it seems to conflict with compassion.
This correlation, viewed through the Blue lens, suggests a significant tension between the Blue value system's rigid adherence to rules and truth-telling and the human impulse to protect the innocent. It implies that even within the typically rule-bound Blue mindset, there may be situations where individuals struggle with the absoluteness of moral dictates.
From this perspective, the correlation invites us to explore the complexities of moral decision-making within highly structured value systems. It prompts us to ask: How do Blue-oriented individuals and organizations navigate situations where strict adherence to rules might lead to perceived injustice? What are the implications for organizational ethics and individual moral development within the Blue value system?
Ultimately, this correlation speaks to the profound challenges that can arise when absolute moral codes encounter complex real-world scenarios. It reminds us that even in the Blue worldview, which typically prizes order and clear moral boundaries, there may be moments of doubt or internal conflict when faced with complex ethical dilemmas.
-0.0683 between the Reduced staff and the Orange stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0553. This negative correlation of -0.0683 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This negative correlation of -0.0683 between reducing staff and the Orange stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Orange value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Orange mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- Validation of their focus on efficiency and optimal resource utilization rather than blunt cost-cutting measures.
- Confirmation that maintaining a skilled workforce is crucial for achieving ambitious goals and driving innovation.
- Evidence supporting their investment in human capital as a key factor for competitive advantage and growth.
These organizations might respond by:
- Implementing advanced analytics to optimize workforce productivity without resorting to staff reductions.
- Investing in upskilling and reskilling programs to enhance employee capabilities and adaptability.
- Developing strategic workforce planning models that align human resources with long-term business objectives.
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from an Orange mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing it as an affirmation of the importance of retaining diverse skill sets for problem-solving and innovation.
- Interpreting it as support for focusing on performance optimization rather than headcount reduction.
- Seeing it as justification for investing in team development and efficiency-enhancing technologies.
These teams might respond by:
- Adopting agile methodologies to increase flexibility and efficiency without reducing team size.
- Implementing data-driven performance metrics to identify and address inefficiencies.
- Organizing cross-functional projects to maximize the utilization of existing team members' skills.
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Orange value system might interpret this correlation as:
- Confirmation that continuous self-improvement and skill development are valued over cost-cutting measures.
- Validation of their focus on personal productivity and contribution to organizational goals.
- Evidence that their ambition and goal-oriented approach align with organizational strategies for success.
These individuals might respond by:
- Investing in personal development and acquiring new skills to enhance their value to the organization.
- Seeking opportunities to demonstrate their efficiency and contribution to company objectives.
- Proposing innovative solutions that improve productivity without necessitating staff reductions.
This correlation, viewed through the Orange lens, suggests that organizations, teams, and individuals operating at the Orange level recognize the value of maintaining a skilled workforce to drive progress and achieve goals. It implies that the Orange value system's ambition, efficiency, and rational problem-solving characteristics align with strategies that prioritize optimizing existing human resources over staff reduction.
Ultimately, this correlation shows the complex relationship between organizational strategy and human capital management in modern, progress-oriented societies. It reminds us that in the Orange worldview, success is often seen as a function of optimizing and developing human potential rather than simply reducing costs through staff cuts.
In our analysis of the poll "12 ways to build trust with others" (by Justin Wright [1]), we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:
0.2001 between the Stay consistent in your actions (Being reliable builds confidence in you) / Disagree and the Green stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.1709. This positive correlation of 0.2001 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This positive correlation of 0.2001 between disagreeing that consistent actions build trust and the Green stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Green value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Green mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- Validation of their emphasis on adaptability and responsiveness to evolving community needs over rigid consistency.
- An opportunity to foster deeper trust through transparent, collaborative decision-making processes rather than predictable but potentially outdated actions.
- Justification for prioritizing holistic, systems-thinking approaches that may appear inconsistent in isolation but serve the greater good.
These organizations might respond by:
- Implementing flexible policies that allow for quick adaptation to changing social and environmental concerns.
- Developing comprehensive stakeholder engagement processes to ensure actions align with community values, even if it means changing course.
- Investing in organizational learning and development programs emphasizing emotional intelligence and systemic understanding over rigid rule-following.
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Green mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing it as an affirmation of the value of diverse perspectives and the need to integrate multiple viewpoints, even if it leads to apparent inconsistencies.
- Interpreting it as a call to prioritize authentic relationships and open communication over predictable but potentially superficial interactions.
- Seeing it as an opportunity to cultivate a learning culture where growth and evolution are valued more than maintaining the status quo.
These teams might respond by:
- Implementing regular reflection sessions to review and potentially revise team norms and practices.
- Encouraging members to share personal growth experiences and how they've changed their views or approaches.
- Celebrating instances where team members showed courage in changing course when presented with new information or perspectives.
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Green value system might interpret this correlation as:
- Personal validation of their commitment to authentic self-expression and growth over maintaining a consistent but potentially inauthentic persona.
- An opportunity to build deeper, more meaningful relationships based on genuine interactions rather than predictable behaviors.
- Justification for embracing complexity and nuance in their worldview, even if it sometimes leads to apparent contradictions.
These individuals might respond by:
- Actively seeking out diverse perspectives and experiences to broaden their understanding and challenge their assumptions.
- Practicing radical honesty in their relationships, openly sharing their evolving thoughts and feelings.
- Engaging in regular self-reflection and personal growth activities, embracing change as a positive aspect of their journey.
This correlation, viewed through the Green lens, suggests that those operating at the Green level may be more inclined to value authenticity, adaptability, and holistic thinking over consistency in building trust. It implies that the Green value system's characteristics of community focus, ecological awareness, and systems thinking align with a more nuanced and context-dependent approach to trust-building.
From this perspective, the correlation invites us to explore the interplay between value systems and concepts of trust and reliability. It prompts us to ask: How does the Green focus on collective well-being and holistic thinking influence perceptions of trustworthiness? What are the potential benefits and challenges of a Green-driven approach to building trust in organizations, teams, and interpersonal relationships?
Ultimately, this correlation speaks to the complex relationship between human values and social dynamics. It reminds us that in the Green worldview, the potential for authentic, adaptive, and systemically aware interactions may be seen as more trust-building than mere consistency of actions. This perspective encourages a more nuanced and context-sensitive approach to understanding and fostering trust in our increasingly complex and interconnected world.
0.1044 between the Employees for which have not changed anything and the Yellow stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0876. This positive correlation of 0.1044 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This positive correlation of 0.1044 between employees for which nothing has changed and the Yellow stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Yellow value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Companies operating within the Yellow mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- Validation of their focus on creating stable yet dynamically balanced work environments that don't require constant upheaval.
- An opportunity to explore the subtle interplay between stability and adaptability in complex organizational systems.
- Justification for prioritizing long-term, sustainable practices over-reactive, short-term changes.
These organizations might respond by:
- Conducting in-depth systems analyses to understand the holistic factors contributing to employee stability.
- Implementing flexible, self-organizing structures that naturally adapt to changing conditions without disrupting employee experiences.
- Investing in personal growth and development programs that foster employee resilience and adaptability within a stable framework.
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Yellow mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing it as an affirmation of their ability to create autonomous team dynamics that remain robust in the face of external changes.
- Interpreting it as a call to explore the nuanced balance between consistency and evolution in team practices.
- Seeing it as an opportunity to deepen their understanding of how individual growth contributes to collective stability.
These teams might respond by:
- Engaging in regular meta-cognitive exercises to reflect on team dynamics and their impact on individual experiences.
- Experimenting with hierarchical structures that allow for both stability and flexibility in team roles and responsibilities.
- Cultivating a team culture that values both personal authenticity and collective harmony, reducing the need for externally imposed changes.
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Yellow value system might interpret this correlation as:
- Personal validation of their ability to maintain inner stability while navigating complex and changing environments.
- An opportunity to explore the relationship between personal growth and environmental constancy.
- Justification for focusing on internal development rather than seeking external changes for fulfillment.
These individuals might respond by:
- Engaging in deep introspection to understand their own role in creating stability within their work environment.
- Practicing advanced mindfulness techniques to cultivate inner peace amidst external flux.
- Seeking opportunities for growth and challenge within their current roles rather than looking for change for its own sake.
This correlation, viewed through the Yellow lens, suggests that those operating at the Yellow level may be more adept at creating and thriving in simultaneously stable and adaptable environments. It implies that the Yellow value system's characteristics of integrative thinking, personal growth focus, and systems understanding align with the ability to maintain consistency while still evolving.
From this perspective, the correlation invites us to explore the complex relationship between individual development, organizational stability, and systemic adaptability. It prompts us to ask: How does the Yellow focus on integrative thinking and personal growth contribute to creating stable yet dynamic work environments? What can we learn from Yellow-oriented individuals and organizations about sustainable change management?
Ultimately, this correlation speaks to the sophisticated interplay between personal development, organizational dynamics, and systemic stability. It reminds us that in the Yellow worldview, the absence of visible change might not indicate stagnation but rather a deep, ongoing process of growth and adaptation that doesn't require external disruption. This perspective encourages a more nuanced and integrative approach to understanding organizational stability and change in our complex, interconnected world.
In our analysis of the poll "My Greatest Fears," we found an intriguing negative correlation that warrants closer examination:
-0.1700 between the Poverty and the Turquoise stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0339. This negative correlation of -0.1700 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This negative correlation of -0.1700 between poverty as fear and the Turquoise stage offers profound insights when viewed through the lens of the Turquoise value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Companies operating within the Turquoise mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- Validation of their holistic approach to value creation that transcends traditional notions of wealth and poverty.
- An opportunity to redefine organizational success regarding overall systemic well-being rather than mere financial metrics.
- Justification for implementing regenerative business models that create abundance for all stakeholders, including the environment.
These organizations might respond by:
- Developing comprehensive wealth metrics that include social, environmental, and spiritual capital alongside financial measures.
- Implementing resource-sharing systems that ensure all employees and communities connected to the organization have their basic needs met.
- Investing in projects that regenerate natural systems and create sustainable abundance reduces societal fear of poverty at a systemic level.
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Turquoise mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing it as an affirmation of their ability to create micro-economies of shared abundance within their team dynamics.
- Interpreting it as a call to explore how team structures can model sustainable, fear-free relationships with resources.
- Seeing it as an opportunity to transcend individual fears by fostering a deep sense of interconnectedness and mutual support.
These teams might respond by:
- Implementing skill-sharing and resource-pooling practices that leverage the collective abundance of the team.
- Cultivating a team culture that values and nurtures each member's unique contributions to the whole, reducing fear of individual scarcity.
- Engaging in collective visioning exercises to imagine and co-create abundant futures that benefit all.
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Turquoise value system might interpret this correlation as:
- Personal validation of their expanded consciousness that recognizes abundance as an inherent quality of the interconnected universe.
- An opportunity to explore how inner spiritual wealth and connection to the whole can transcend material fears.
- Justification for focusing on personal growth and contribution to the greater good rather than accumulating personal wealth.
These individuals might respond by:
- Deepening their spiritual practices to cultivate a connection with the universe's abundance.
- Engaging in gift economy practices, freely sharing their skills and resources to create webs of mutual support.
- Redefining their notion of wealth to include non-material aspects such as meaningful relationships, personal growth, and contribution to planetary well-being.
This correlation, viewed through the Turquoise lens, suggests that those operating at the Turquoise level may have transcended traditional fears of poverty through a profound shift in consciousness. It implies that the Turquoise value system's holistic thinking, spiritual connection, and recognition of universal interconnectedness align with a fundamentally different relationship to material resources and wealth.
From this perspective, the correlation invites us to explore the deep interconnections between consciousness, value systems, and economic fears. It prompts us to ask how Turquoise's focus on universal interconnectedness and holistic well-being transforms our relationship with material resources. What can we learn from Turquoise-oriented individuals and organizations about creating systems of sustainable abundance that alleviate poverty fears at a collective level?
The Turquoise perspective reminds us that true wealth extends far beyond material possessions. It encompasses the richness of interconnected ecosystems, the depth of human relationships, the boundless potential for growth and evolution, and the profound sense of purpose that comes from aligning with the greater good of all beings. In this view, poverty becomes impossible profoundly, as everyone is recognized as an invaluable, inseparable part of the cosmic whole.
Ultimately, this correlation speaks to the profound shift in perspective that occurs at the Turquoise level of consciousness. It suggests that as individuals and collectives evolve toward a more integrated, holistic worldview, their fears around material scarcity diminish. This may be because they recognize abundance as an inherent quality of the interconnected universe and see themselves as integral parts of that larger whole.
What insights do you gain from today's correlation? How might we study this relationship more carefully before deducing causation?
We welcome respectful and wise perspectives! Stay tuned every week as we share more results and insights.
After login or registration, free access to the poll results in the FAQ section.
[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/jwmba/
Валерий Косенко
Владелец продукта SDTEST®
Валерий получил квалифицию социального педагога-психолога в 1993 году и с тех пор применял свои знания в области управления проектами.
В 2013 году он получил степень магистра и квалификацию менеджера по управлению проектами и программами. Во время своей магистерской программы он познакомился с Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanage e. V.) и Спиральной Динамикой.
Валерий изучил различные тесты по Спиральной Динамике и использовал свои знания и опыт, чтобы адаптировать текущую версию SDTEST.
Валерий является автором идеи изучения неопределенности концепции V.U.C.A. при помощи Спиральной Динамики и математической статистики в психологии, более 20 международных опросов.
