SDTEST® has 38 different VUCA polls that calculate the 13,643 correlation values between stages of development according to the theory of Spiral Dynamics and answer options of these 38 polls.
We invite curiosity about the systemic mechanisms behind this correlation. There may be hidden variables that provide alternative explanations.
In our analysis of the poll "Reasons why people give up" (by Anna Vital [1]), we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:
0.0821 between the Believe in their weaknesses and the Purple stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0561. This positive correlation of 0.0821 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
The positive correlation of 0.0821 between "Believe in their weaknesses" and the Purple stage reveals profound insights into human vulnerability and collective identity:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Purple value system might interpret this correlation as:
- Validation of collective vulnerability and group limitations
- Confirmation of predetermined ancestral narratives
- Evidence supporting the power of traditional belief systems
These organizations might respond by:
- Reinforcing collective mythological frameworks
- Maintaining strict hierarchical structures
- Preserving ancestral interpretations of individual weakness
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Purple mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Recognizing collective vulnerability as a fundamental truth
- Understanding weakness through traditional spiritual lenses
- Interpreting individual limitations as group destiny
These teams might respond by:
- Developing ritualistic coping mechanisms
- Creating protective group narratives
- Establishing sacred interpretations of personal challenges
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Purple value system might interpret this correlation as:
- Confirmation of predetermined personal limitations
- Validation of ancestral interpretations of individual worth
- Recognition of supernatural influences on personal potential
These individuals might respond by:
- Accepting predetermined life trajectories
- Seeking spiritual explanations for personal weaknesses
- Surrendering individual agency to collective beliefs
This correlation, viewed through the Purple lens, suggests that believing in personal weaknesses is fundamentally intertwined with collective identity. It implies that the Purple value system's deep-rooted traditional beliefs create a framework where individual limitations are seen as predetermined and spiritually ordained.
This correlation demands a critical examination of how traditional value systems construct narratives of personal potential. It reveals the profound implications of collective belief systems in shaping individual perceptions of weakness, exposing the intricate relationship between cultural mythology and personal limitations.
Reasons Why Believing in Weaknesses Leads to Giving Up in the Purple Stage:
- Ancestral Determinism: Viewing personal limitations as inherited, unalterable destinies
- Spiritual Fatalism: Believing supernatural forces predetermine individual outcomes
- Collective Mythology: Accepting group narratives that reinforce personal inadequacy
- Ritualistic Interpretation: Understanding weakness through sacred, traditional lenses
- Hierarchical Submission: Surrendering individual potential to collective belief systems
Ultimately, this correlation illuminates the Purple stage's fundamental belief: personal potential is intrinsically linked to collective mythology, with individual weaknesses interpreted through the lens of ancestral wisdom and spiritually predetermined narratives.
In our analysis of the poll "I live thinking about my past, present or future," we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:
0.0609 between the Future and the Red stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a non-normal distribution, by Spearman r = 0.0023. This positive correlation of 0.0609 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This positive correlation of 0.0609 between the Future and the Red stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Red value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Red mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- A strategic mechanism for power consolidation
- An opportunity to anticipate and dominate future challenges
- A means to maintain competitive advantage through forward-thinking
These organizations might respond by:
- Developing aggressive future-planning strategies
- Creating reward systems that prioritize predictive power
- Implementing rapid decision-making processes focused on immediate gains
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Red mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing future thinking as a survival mechanism
- Using anticipation to identify potential threats to group dominance
- Treating future orientation as a competitive team skill
These teams might respond by:
- Conducting strategic sessions focused on conquest
- Encouraging members to develop predictive capabilities
- Valuing individual contributions that enhance the team's future positioning
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Red value system might interpret this correlation as:
- A personal survival strategy
- A tool for maximizing self-interest
- A method of maintaining personal power and control
These individuals might respond by:
- Constantly scanning for personal advantages
- Developing individual strategies to overcome potential obstacles
- Treating future planning as a competitive personal skill
This correlation, viewed through the Red lens, suggests that those operating at the Red level may be more likely to approach future thinking as a tool for personal and collective dominance. It implies that the Red value system's assertiveness, competitiveness, and focus on immediate gratification align with a more aggressive approach to anticipating and shaping future outcomes.
Reasons Why Future Thinking Matters in the Red Stage:
- Self-Preservation: Future orientation as a fundamental survival mechanism
- Power Dynamics: Anticipation as a means of maintaining and expanding control
- Competitive Advantage: Predictive thinking as a way to outmaneuver competitors
- Immediate Gratification: Future planning aligned with short-term goal achievement
- Personal Empowerment: Using foresight to create personal opportunities
This correlation prompts us to consider how the Red value system approaches future thinking through a lens of power, survival, and personal advancement. It reveals that even in the most impulsive developmental stage, individuals and organizations recognize the strategic value of looking ahead.
Ultimately, this correlation highlights the complex relationship between future orientation and the Red value system's core characteristics of power, self-expression, and individualism.
In our analysis of the poll "AI and the end of civilization" (by Elon Musk), we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:
0.1019 between the Artificial intelligence is dangerous to human civilization / Strongly agree and the Blue stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0757. This positive correlation of 0.1019 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This positive correlation of 0.1019 between Strongly Agreeing that Artificial Intelligence is Dangerous to Human Civilization and the Blue stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Blue value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Blue mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- Validation of their belief in strict moral boundaries
- Confirmation of the need for rigorous control over technological advancement
- Evidence supporting their traditional view of human-technology relationships
These organizations might respond by:
- Developing stringent regulations on AI development
- Creating hierarchical oversight mechanisms for technological innovation
- Implementing comprehensive ethical guidelines that restrict AI autonomy
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Blue mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing AI as a potential threat to established social order
- Interpreting technological advancement as a challenge to traditional values
- Seeing AI as a risk to hierarchical structures and human authority
These teams might respond by:
- Developing collective strategies to limit AI integration
- Creating internal protocols to resist technological disruption
- Promoting a unified stance against uncontrolled technological innovation
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Blue value system might interpret this correlation as:
- A moral imperative to protect human civilization
- Confirmation of their skepticism towards radical technological change
- A validation of their belief in human-centric decision-making
These individuals might respond by:
- Advocating for strict regulatory frameworks
- Challenging AI development through moral and ethical arguments
- Supporting conservative approaches to technological innovation
This correlation, viewed through the Blue lens, suggests that those operating at the Blue level are more likely to perceive AI as a fundamental threat to established social structures and moral frameworks. It implies that the Blue value system's emphasis on order, tradition, and hierarchical control aligns with a cautious and potentially fearful approach to artificial intelligence.
Reasons Why AI is Perceived as Dangerous in the Blue Stage:
- Threat to Established Order: AI challenges traditional hierarchical structures
- Moral Uncertainty: Technological advancement conflicts with rigid ethical frameworks
- Loss of Human Control: AI represents a potential breakdown of established authority
- Violation of Traditional Values: Advanced technology threatens conservative worldviews
- Erosion of Human Agency: AI challenges the Blue stage's belief in human-centric decision-making
This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems, particularly the Blue system, influence perceptions of technological risks and societal threats. It raises questions about the potential benefits and drawbacks of a conservative approach to technological innovation, particularly in contexts where technological advancement and complex problem-solving are crucial for human progress and survival.
Ultimately, this correlation highlights the complex relationship between technological skepticism and the Blue value system's core characteristics of order, discipline, and traditional moral frameworks.
In our analysis of the poll "Meritocracy" (Does the organization provide equal career growth and development opportunities regardless of gender, race, or other personal characteristics?), we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:
0.1816 between the YES, provides equal career growth and development opportunities and the Orange stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.1181. This positive correlation of 0.1816 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This positive correlation of 0.1816 between Equal Career Opportunities and the Orange stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Orange value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Orange mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- A strategic approach to maximizing human potential
- An opportunity to optimize talent acquisition and retention
- A rational method for ensuring competitive advantage through diverse talent
These organizations might respond by:
- Implementing data-driven diversity and inclusion strategies
- Creating meritocratic performance evaluation systems
- Developing objective career progression frameworks
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from an Orange mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Viewing equal opportunities as a performance optimization strategy
- Recognizing diversity as a source of innovative problem-solving
- Treating career development as a rational, objective process
These teams might respond by:
- Establishing transparent skill-based promotion criteria
- Encouraging cross-functional skill development
- Creating performance metrics that minimize bias
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Orange value system might interpret this correlation as:
- A personal opportunity for rational self-development
- A method of maximizing individual potential
- A logical approach to career advancement
These individuals might respond by:
- Pursuing skill-based professional development
- Leveraging objective performance metrics
- Seeking opportunities that demonstrate measurable progress
This correlation, viewed through the Orange lens, suggests that those operating at the Orange level are more likely to perceive equal career opportunities as a rational, strategic approach to organizational effectiveness. It implies that the Orange value system's focus on efficiency, logic, and individual achievement aligns with meritocratic principles.
Reasons Why Equal Opportunities Matter in the Orange Stage:
- Performance Optimization: Maximizing talent potential across all demographics
- Competitive Advantage: Accessing broader talent pools
- Rational Resource Allocation: Reducing irrational barriers to individual achievement
- Innovation Potential: Leveraging diverse perspectives for problem-solving
- Objective Performance Measurement: Focusing on individual capabilities over group characteristics
This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence perceptions of organizational effectiveness and individual opportunity. It raises questions about the potential benefits and drawbacks of an Orange approach to career development, particularly in contexts where long-term organizational innovation and complex human potential management are crucial.
Ultimately, this correlation highlights the complex relationship between meritocratic principles and the Orange value system's core characteristics of rationality, efficiency, and individual achievement.
In our analysis of the poll "Why do people procrastinate?" we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:
0.0737 between the Life of Distraction: Frequent interruptions or distractions that divert attention and hinder task completion / Not Applicable and the Green stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0695. This positive correlation of 0.0737 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This positive correlation of 0.0737 between Life of Distraction: Not Applicable and the Green stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Green value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Green mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- A reflection of holistic, purpose-driven work approaches
- Evidence of collaborative and mindful organizational cultures
- Validation of integrated, systemic thinking in work environments
These organizations might respond by:
- Creating collaborative work spaces
- Implementing mindful productivity practices
- Developing holistic performance measurement systems
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Green mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Prioritizing collective focus and shared goals
- Valuing deep, meaningful work over fragmented attention
- Emphasizing collective well-being and interconnectedness
These teams might respond by:
- Establishing collective attention practices
- Developing communication protocols that minimize distractions
- Creating supportive environments that foster concentrated effort
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Green value system might interpret this correlation as:
- A commitment to purposeful, meaningful work
- An expression of personal and collective consciousness
- A reflection of integrated personal and professional development
These individuals might respond by:
- Practicing mindfulness and presence
- Seeking work with deeper social significance
- Cultivating personal focus and intentionality
This correlation, viewed through the Green lens, suggests that those operating at the Green level are more likely to transcend a distraction-driven lifestyle. It implies that the Green value system's emphasis on holistic thinking, community, and personal growth aligns with a more intentional and focused approach to work and life.
Reasons Why Life of Distraction is Not Applicable in the Green Stage:
- Holistic Consciousness: Prioritizing systemic, integrated thinking
- Collective Purpose: Valuing meaningful contribution over fragmented attention
- Mindful Engagement: Emphasizing presence and intentional action
- Interconnected Worldview: Recognizing the impact of individual focus
- Sustainable Personal Development: Cultivating depth over superficial stimulation
This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence perceptions of healthy team dynamics. It raises questions about the potential benefits and drawbacks of a Green approach to focus and intention within teams, particularly in contexts where long-term collaboration and complex problem-solving are crucial.
Ultimately, this correlation highlights the complex interplay between cultural values, team dynamics, and organizational effectiveness. The relationship between consciousness, focus, and collaborative approaches might be seen as a critical factor in creating more meaningful and intentional work environments.
In our analysis of the poll "Gender difference in building self-confidence" (by IFD Allensbach)" we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:
0.1159 between the Encouragement by parents and the Yellow stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.1095. This positive correlation of 0.1159 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This positive correlation of 0.1159 between Encouragement by parents and the Yellow stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Yellow value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Yellow mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- A sophisticated understanding of developmental psychology and systemic human potential
- Evidence of the complex, interconnected nature of personal growth mechanisms
- Validation of holistic approaches to human capital development
These organizations might respond by:
- Designing integrated mentorship and personal development programs
- Creating learning environments that recognize multi-dimensional growth
- Developing adaptive leadership frameworks that support individual potential
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Yellow mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Recognizing the nuanced, systemic impact of early psychological influences
- Understanding parental encouragement as a multifaceted developmental catalyst
- Appreciating the intricate relationships between personal history and self-confidence
These teams might respond by:
- Facilitating deep, reflective dialogues about personal growth
- Creating supportive ecosystems that honor individual developmental trajectories
- Implementing collaborative learning models that transcend traditional hierarchies
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Yellow value system might interpret this correlation as:
- An opportunity for profound self-reflection and systemic understanding
- A chance to integrate past experiences into a holistic personal narrative
- A pathway to transcending limiting psychological patterns
These individuals might respond by:
- Engaging in comprehensive self-analysis and personal development
- Seeking to understand the complex systemic roots of their self-confidence
- Developing meta-cognitive strategies for continuous personal evolution
This correlation, viewed through the Yellow lens, suggests that those operating at the Yellow level are more likely to understand encouragement as a complex, multi-dimensional developmental process. It implies that the Yellow value system's emphasis on integration, systemic thinking, and personal transformation provides a sophisticated framework for understanding self-confidence.
Reasons Why Parental Encouragement is Crucial in the Yellow Stage:
- Systemic Awareness: Recognizing encouragement as part of a broader developmental ecosystem
- Meta-Cognitive Integration: Understanding how early experiences shape psychological frameworks
- Holistic Personal Development: Seeing encouragement as a catalyst for comprehensive growth
- Transcendence of Limited Perspectives: Moving beyond simplistic cause-and-effect models
- Complex Self-Understanding: Integrating multiple layers of personal experience and potential
This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems interpret developmental processes. It raises questions about the potential depth and complexity of personal growth mechanisms, particularly in contexts where holistic, integrative approaches to human potential are paramount.
Ultimately, this correlation highlights the intricate relationship between parental encouragement and self-confidence, viewed through a lens of systemic complexity and integrative understanding.
In our analysis of the poll "XING's culture assessment" (Strategic direction (terrible). Imagine a terrible employer - which aspects do you dislike the most?), we found an intriguing negative correlation that warrants closer examination:
-0.2311 between The company lacks clear processes and the Turquoise stage.
The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.1567. This negative correlation of -0.2311 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.
This negative correlation of -0.2311 between The company lacks clear processes and the Turquoise stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Turquoise value system:
Organizational Perspective:
Organizations operating within the Turquoise mindset might interpret this correlation as:
- A reflection of sophisticated, emergent organizational intelligence
- Evidence of adaptive, non-linear approaches to organizational design
- Validation of intuitive, holistic systems thinking that transcends rigid structures
These organizations might respond by:
- Developing organic, self-organizing management approaches
- Creating fluid communication ecosystems
- Implementing adaptive governance models that prioritize collective wisdom
Team Perspective:
Teams operating from a Turquoise mindset might approach this correlation by:
- Embracing dynamic, context-sensitive collaboration
- Prioritizing collective consciousness over prescriptive processes
- Recognizing the interconnectedness of organizational interactions beyond formal structures
These teams might respond by:
- Developing intuitive, purpose-driven team dynamics
- Creating permeable boundaries between team functions
- Implementing emergent problem-solving approaches
Individual Perspective:
Individuals aligned with the Turquoise value system might interpret this correlation as:
- An opportunity for holistic, systemic understanding
- A chance to transcend traditional organizational constraints
- A pathway to more intuitive, interconnected work experiences
These individuals might respond by:
- Cultivating personal and collective awareness
- Developing adaptive, context-sensitive problem-solving skills
- Embracing a more holistic approach to professional contribution
This correlation, viewed through the Turquoise lens, suggests that those operating at the Turquoise level are less likely to be constrained by traditional process-driven organizational models. It implies that the Turquoise value system's emphasis on interconnectedness, holistic thinking, and ecological awareness provides a sophisticated framework for understanding organizational dynamics.
Reasons Why Lack of Clear Processes Becomes Less Critical in the Turquoise Stage:
- Holistic Systems Thinking: Prioritizing emergent, adaptive organizational approaches
- Collective Intelligence: Valuing intuitive, interconnected decision-making
- Ecological Perspective: Recognizing organizations as living, dynamic ecosystems
- Contextual Flexibility: Embracing context-sensitive problem-solving
- Interconnected Consciousness: Transcending rigid structural limitations
This negative correlation reveals a profound insight: as Turquoise thinking becomes more prevalent, the importance of rigid, predefined processes diminishes, giving way to more adaptive, intuitive, and interconnected organizational approaches.
Ultimately, this correlation highlights the intricate relationship between organizational structure and holistic, systems-level thinking in the Turquoise value system.
What insights do you gain from today's correlation? How might we study this relationship more carefully before deducing causation?
We welcome respectful and wise perspectives! Stay tuned every week as we share more results and insights.
After login or registration, free access to the poll results in the FAQ section.
[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/annavital
2024.12.15
Valerii Kosenko
產品負責人 SaaS SDTEST®
Valerii 於 1993 年獲得社會教育心理學家資格，此後將他的知識應用於專案管理。
Valerii 於 2013 年獲得碩士學位以及專案和專案經理資格。
Valerii 是探討 V.U.C.A. 不確定性的作者。使用螺旋動力學和心理學數理統計的概念，以及 38 個國際民意調查。
