Grāmata balstīta tests «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
Sponsors

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Bailes

valsts
valoda
-
Mail
Pārrēķināt
Kritiskais vērtību korelācijas koeficienta
Normāla izplatīšana, autors Viljams Sealijs Gossets (students) r = 0.0322
Normāla izplatīšana, autors Viljams Sealijs Gossets (students) r = 0.0322
Non parasts sadalījums, autors Spearman r = 0.0013
SadalījumsNenormālsNenormālsNenormālsNormālsNormālsNormālsNormālsNormāls
Visi jautājumi
Visi jautājumi
Mana lielākā bailes ir
Mana lielākā bailes ir
Answer 1-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0482
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0333
Vāja negatīva
-0.0178
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0944
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0354
Vāja negatīva
-0.0171
Vāja negatīva
-0.1538
Answer 2-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0174
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0011
Vāja negatīva
-0.0402
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0648
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0458
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0125
Vāja negatīva
-0.0960
Answer 3-
Vāja negatīva
-0.0041
Vāja negatīva
-0.0091
Vāja negatīva
-0.0457
Vāja negatīva
-0.0452
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0480
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0760
Vāja negatīva
-0.0179
Answer 4-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0395
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0308
Vāja negatīva
-0.0225
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0193
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0305
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0233
Vāja negatīva
-0.0963
Answer 5-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0251
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1311
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0097
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0793
Vāja negatīva
-0.0013
Vāja negatīva
-0.0223
Vāja negatīva
-0.1782
Answer 6-
Vāja negatīva
-0.0063
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0106
Vāja negatīva
-0.0658
Vāja negatīva
-0.0081
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0208
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0844
Vāja negatīva
-0.0308
Answer 7-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0102
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0417
Vāja negatīva
-0.0701
Vāja negatīva
-0.0279
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0479
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0660
Vāja negatīva
-0.0502
Answer 8-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0636
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0810
Vāja negatīva
-0.0282
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0139
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0352
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0140
Vāja negatīva
-0.1346
Answer 9-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0657
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1683
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0050
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0671
Vāja negatīva
-0.0147
Vāja negatīva
-0.0505
Vāja negatīva
-0.1789
Answer 10-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0751
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0714
Vāja negatīva
-0.0215
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0267
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0290
Vāja negatīva
-0.0113
Vāja negatīva
-0.1304
Answer 11-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0615
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0584
Vāja negatīva
-0.0058
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0074
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0185
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0234
Vāja negatīva
-0.1234
Answer 12-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0410
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0994
Vāja negatīva
-0.0346
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0348
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0296
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0233
Vāja negatīva
-0.1529
Answer 13-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0660
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1017
Vāja negatīva
-0.0382
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0281
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0398
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0139
Vāja negatīva
-0.1626
Answer 14-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0718
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0982
Vāja negatīva
-0.0017
Vāja negatīva
-0.0070
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0024
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0108
Vāja negatīva
-0.1221
Answer 15-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0549
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1333
Vāja negatīva
-0.0333
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0169
Vāja negatīva
-0.0197
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0204
Vāja negatīva
-0.1180
Answer 16-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0657
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0273
Vāja negatīva
-0.0343
Vāja negatīva
-0.0433
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0646
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0246
Vāja negatīva
-0.0750


Eksportēt uz MS Excel
Šī funkcija būs pieejama jūsu VUCA aptaujās
Labi

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
Valerii Kosenko
Produkta īpašnieks SaaS SDTEST®

Valērijs 1993. gadā ieguva sociālā pedagoga-psihologa kvalifikāciju un kopš tā laika ir pielietojis savas zināšanas projektu vadībā.
Valērijs 2013. gadā ieguva maģistra grādu un projektu un programmu vadītāja kvalifikāciju. Maģistra programmas laikā viņš iepazinās ar Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) un Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii ir V.U.C.A. nenoteiktības izpētes autors. koncepcija, izmantojot spirālveida dinamiku un matemātisko statistiku psiholoģijā, un 38 starptautiskas aptaujas.
Šim amatam ir 0 Komentāri
Atbildēt uz
Atcelt atbildi
Atstājiet savu komentāru
×
Atrodat kļūdu
Informējiet par pareizo versiju
Ievadiet savu e-pasta adresi, kā vēlamo
Sūtīt
atcelt
Redirect to your region's domain sdtest.us ?
YES
NO
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Ļaujiet man jums jautāt, vai jūs jau esat pazīstams ar spirāles dinamiku?