Grāmata balstīta tests «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
Sponsors

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Bailes

valsts
valoda
-
Mail
Pārrēķināt
Kritiskais vērtību korelācijas koeficienta
Normāla izplatīšana, autors Viljams Sealijs Gossets (students) r = 0.0315
Normāla izplatīšana, autors Viljams Sealijs Gossets (students) r = 0.0315
Non parasts sadalījums, autors Spearman r = 0.0013
SadalījumsNenormālsNenormālsNenormālsNormālsNormālsNormālsNormālsNormāls
Visi jautājumi
Visi jautājumi
Mana lielākā bailes ir
Mana lielākā bailes ir
Answer 1-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0518
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0257
Vāja negatīva
-0.0203
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0942
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0391
Vāja negatīva
-0.0141
Vāja negatīva
-0.1546
Answer 2-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0178
Vāja negatīva
-0.0071
Vāja negatīva
-0.0376
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0631
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0501
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0133
Vāja negatīva
-0.0955
Answer 3-
Vāja negatīva
-0.0025
Vāja negatīva
-0.0083
Vāja negatīva
-0.0456
Vāja negatīva
-0.0432
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0498
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0768
Vāja negatīva
-0.0241
Answer 4-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0428
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0297
Vāja negatīva
-0.0259
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0175
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0374
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0266
Vāja negatīva
-0.1027
Answer 5-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0228
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1240
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0115
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0735
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0010
Vāja negatīva
-0.0152
Vāja negatīva
-0.1755
Answer 6-
Vāja negatīva
-0.0021
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0028
Vāja negatīva
-0.0619
Vāja negatīva
-0.0110
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0269
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0872
Vāja negatīva
-0.0366
Answer 7-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0107
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0313
Vāja negatīva
-0.0667
Vāja negatīva
-0.0310
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0538
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0715
Vāja negatīva
-0.0532
Answer 8-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0653
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0688
Vāja negatīva
-0.0267
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0117
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0398
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0185
Vāja negatīva
-0.1345
Answer 9-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0740
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1594
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0050
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0612
Vāja negatīva
-0.0067
Vāja negatīva
-0.0464
Vāja negatīva
-0.1836
Answer 10-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0754
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0624
Vāja negatīva
-0.0144
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0273
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0336
Vāja negatīva
-0.0107
Vāja negatīva
-0.1359
Answer 11-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0626
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0495
Vāja negatīva
-0.0084
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0094
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0277
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0251
Vāja negatīva
-0.1276
Answer 12-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0429
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0889
Vāja negatīva
-0.0323
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0317
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0350
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0265
Vāja negatīva
-0.1531
Answer 13-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0705
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0917
Vāja negatīva
-0.0384
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0287
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0437
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0151
Vāja negatīva
-0.1634
Answer 14-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0812
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0862
Vāja negatīva
-0.0035
Vāja negatīva
-0.0129
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0076
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0152
Vāja negatīva
-0.1208
Answer 15-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0555
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1235
Vāja negatīva
-0.0340
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0113
Vāja negatīva
-0.0139
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0261
Vāja negatīva
-0.1160
Answer 16-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0715
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0212
Vāja negatīva
-0.0388
Vāja negatīva
-0.0401
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0745
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0178
Vāja negatīva
-0.0772


Eksportēt uz MS Excel
Šī funkcija būs pieejama jūsu VUCA aptaujās
Labi

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
Valerii Kosenko
Produkta īpašnieks SaaS SDTEST®

Valērijs 1993. gadā ieguva sociālā pedagoga-psihologa kvalifikāciju un kopš tā laika ir pielietojis savas zināšanas projektu vadībā.
Valērijs 2013. gadā ieguva maģistra grādu un projektu un programmu vadītāja kvalifikāciju. Maģistra programmas laikā viņš iepazinās ar Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) un Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii ir V.U.C.A. nenoteiktības izpētes autors. koncepcija, izmantojot spirālveida dinamiku un matemātisko statistiku psiholoģijā, un 38 starptautiskas aptaujas.
Šim amatam ir 0 Komentāri
Atbildēt uz
Atcelt atbildi
Atstājiet savu komentāru
×
Atrodat kļūdu
Informējiet par pareizo versiju
Ievadiet savu e-pasta adresi, kā vēlamo
Sūtīt
atcelt
Redirect to your region's domain sdtest.us ?
YES
NO
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Ļaujiet man jums jautāt, vai jūs jau esat pazīstams ar spirāles dinamiku?