AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Dirbtinis intelektas ir civilizacijos pabaiga

Šalis
kalba
-
Mail
Perskaičiuoti
Kritinė reikšmė koreliacijos koeficientas
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0727
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0727
Ne normalus pasiskirstymas, autorius Spearman r = 0.003
PaskirstymasNe
normalu
NormalusNe
normalu
NormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalus
Visi klausimai
Visi klausimai
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 1-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0734
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0222
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0930
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1129
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0082
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0441
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0172
Answer 2-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0176
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0064
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0439
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0235
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0411
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0037
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0536
Answer 2-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0237
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0293
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0041
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0580
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0254
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0131
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0056
Answer 3-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0353
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0020
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0147
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0434
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0329
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0045
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0461
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0159
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0257
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0233
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0425
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0329
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0241
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0546
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0137
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0525
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0709
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0701
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0147
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0443
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0137
Answer 5-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0651
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0972
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0603
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0026
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0092
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0026
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0252
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 6-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0139
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0048
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0805
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0622
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0317
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0783
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0456
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0230
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0258
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0352
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0274
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0832
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0126
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0582
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0143
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0423
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0553
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0195
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0021
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0614
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0320
Answer 8-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0256
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0035
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0149
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0597
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0187
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0176
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0573
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0173
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0347
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0531
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0412
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0701
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0068
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0464
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0930
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0342
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0141
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0112
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0211
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0739
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0020
Answer 10-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0002
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0882
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0341
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0785
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0241
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0070
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0777


Eksportas į MS Excel
Ši funkcija bus prieinama jūsų VUCA apklausose
Gerai



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Produkto savininkas SaaS SDTEST®

1993 metais Valerii įgijo socialinio pedagogo-psichologo kvalifikaciją ir nuo tada savo žinias pritaikė projektų valdyme.
2013 m. Valerii įgijo magistro laipsnį ir projektų bei programų vadovo kvalifikaciją. Magistrantūros studijų metu susipažino su Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) ir Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii yra V.U.C.A. netikrumo tyrinėjimo autorius. koncepcija, naudojant spiralinę dinamiką ir matematinę statistiką psichologijoje, ir 38 tarptautinės apklausos.
Šis įrašas turi 0 Komentarai
Atsakinėti į
Atšaukti atsakymą
Palikite savo komentarą
×
Rasite klaidą
SIŪLYTI SAVO Teisingas versija
Įveskite savo e-mail kaip norim
Siųsti
atšaukti
Redirect to your region's domain sdtest.us ?
YES
NO
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Leiskite paklausti tavęs, ar jūs jau susipažinote su spiralės dinamika?